Talk:Administration over HTTP - Revision history

ChrML: /* Waste of time */

2006-05-09T17:13:46Z

Waste of time

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 9 May 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	--[[User:ChrML\|ChrML]]		--[[User:ChrML\|ChrML]]

	To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me)~~. It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh..~~.		To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me).

ChrML: /* Waste of time */

2006-05-09T17:10:58Z

Waste of time

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 9 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Waste of time ==		== Waste of time ==
	[[ChrML]]		--[[User:ChrML\|ChrML]]

	To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me). It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh...		To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me). It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh...

ChrML: /* Waste of time */

2006-05-09T17:10:38Z

Waste of time

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 9 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Waste of time ==		== Waste of time ==
			[[ChrML]]

	To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me). It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh...		To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me). It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh...

ChrML: Waste of time

2006-05-09T17:10:21Z

Waste of time

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 9 May 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	We're talking about developing a complete remote administration GUI for a browser here. Stuff like GMail isn't created in one month.		We're talking about developing a complete remote administration GUI for a browser here. Stuff like GMail isn't created in one month.

			== Waste of time ==

			To be honest, this is a rather large project that a minority of our community will benefit. It's a waste of time we could use to do other things like improving our script functions, sync things and get the bugs fixed so we can get this released. It's not a feature too many people will think is "very exciting" when we announce it, and we'll be wasting months on this (believe me). It's almost worse than the voice implementation idea for Race tbh...

IJs: /* AJAX? */

2006-05-09T14:56:51Z

AJAX?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 9 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==AJAX?==		==AJAX?==
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:56, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.

	Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on + we will have to build a webserver that fits into our server, and I think that's a waste of our time. (Except of course when somebody else could develop this for us.)		Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on + we will have to build a webserver that fits into our server, and I think that's a waste of our time. (Except of course when somebody else could develop this for us.)

	We're talking about developing a complete remote administration GUI for a browser here. Stuff like GMail isn't created in one month.		We're talking about developing a complete remote administration GUI for a browser here. Stuff like GMail isn't created in one month.

IJs: /* AJAX? */

2006-05-09T14:56:11Z

AJAX?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 9 May 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.

	Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, ''we'' will have to provide a base where third party people can build on + we will have to build a webserver that fits into our server, and I think that's a waste of our time. (Except of course when somebody else could develop this for us.)		Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on + we will have to build a webserver that fits into our server, and I think that's a waste of our time. (Except of course when somebody else could develop this for us.)

	~~Anyways.. I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is,~~ for ~~example, provided by~~ a ~~PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality~~. ~~The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source~~.		We're talking about developing a complete remote administration GUI for a browser here. Stuff like GMail isn't created in one month.

IJs: /* AJAX? */

2006-05-09T14:53:06Z

AJAX?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 9 May 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.

	Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on, and I think that's a waste of our time.		Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, ''we'' will have to provide a base where third party people can build on + we will have to build a webserver that fits into our server, and I think that's a waste of our time. (Except of course when somebody else could develop this for us.)

	I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is, for example, provided by a PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality. The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source.		Anyways.. I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is, for example, provided by a PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality. The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source.

IJs: /* AJAX? */

2006-05-09T14:47:28Z

AJAX?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 9 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==AJAX?==		==AJAX?==
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.
	Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. Open Source). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on, and I think that's a waste of our time.
			Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community driven development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. an Open Source project). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on, and I think that's a waste of our time.

	I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is, for example, provided by a PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality. The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source.		I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is, for example, provided by a PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality. The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source.

IJs at 14:46, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T14:46:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 9 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==AJAX?==		==AJAX?==
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.
			Besides, I think that the approach mentioned in the article (the part refering to AJAX) is way too professional and unnecessarily complex for a community development project (where developers from our community can participate.. a.k.a. Open Source). In order to make this project work, with "platforms" like AJAX, we will have to provide a base where third party people can build on, and I think that's a waste of our time.

			I would rather stick to simple and plain admin HTTP functionality that is, for example, provided by a PHP script on a separate webserver that speaks to the MTA server by using a special TCP port. The only thing we would need for that is TCP sockets functionality. The whole administration thing would, of course, be open-source.

IJs at 14:37, 9 May 2006

2006-05-09T14:37:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 9 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~*~~AJAX?~~*~~		==AJAX?==
	--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.		--[[User:IJs\|IJs]] 09:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT) - Reference has been placed. I assume nobody actually knows what AJAX is.