Talk:CreateProjectile - Revision history

Myonlake at 14:01, 1 April 2014

2014-04-01T14:01:37Z

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:01, 1 April 2014

Myonlake at 14:01, 1 April 2014

2014-04-01T14:01:26Z

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:01, 1 April 2014

Lopez at 13:31, 1 April 2014

2014-04-01T13:31:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 1 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:

	== Non confirmed issues ==		== Non confirmed issues ==
			Whether issue should be confirmed on bugtrack before it will be added there? [[User:Lopez\|Lopez]] 13:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
	Whether issue should be confirmed on bugtrack before it will be added there?

Lopez: /* Non confirmed issues */ new section

2014-04-01T13:31:05Z

Non confirmed issues: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 1 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)		::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
	:::What rocket type is this (for docs)? --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 22:34, 19 April 2008 (CDT)		:::What rocket type is this (for docs)? --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 22:34, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

			== Non confirmed issues ==

			Whether issue should be confirmed on bugtrack before it will be added there?

Talidan at 03:34, 20 April 2008

2008-04-20T03:34:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 20 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
	::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)		::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
			:::What rocket type is this (for docs)? --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 22:34, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

Stevvo at 11:19, 19 April 2008

2008-04-19T11:19:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 19 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
	:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
			::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

EAi at 00:41, 19 April 2008

2008-04-19T00:41:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 19 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
	:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you ~~mantis~~ this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

EAi at 00:38, 19 April 2008

2008-04-19T00:38:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 19 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
			:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you mantis this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

Stevvo: New page: If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this fun...

2008-04-18T22:14:08Z

New page: If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this fun...

New page

If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 20 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)		:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
	::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)		::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo\|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
			:::What rocket type is this (for docs)? --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 22:34, 19 April 2008 (CDT)