User talk:Ccw - Revision history

Msnhinet8: /* sync_map_element_data */

2017-10-26T02:51:31Z

sync_map_element_data

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 26 October 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:

	::I've tried to clarify [[Meta.xml]] --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)		::I've tried to clarify [[Meta.xml]] --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

			== DBQuery ==
			*hi, my wiki form is view DBQueryErro can you help me?--[[User:Msnhinet8\|Msnhinet8]] ([[User talk:Msnhinet8\|talk]]) 02:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Ccw at 03:26, 17 June 2012

2012-06-17T03:26:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 17 June 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Still don't get it...<br>		Still don't get it...<br>
	As I understand this, if the option is set to false, 'map download' goes separately from another download... which download? sorry if the question is stupid :\| --[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 14:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)		As I understand this, if the option is set to false, 'map download' goes separately from another download... which download? sorry if the question is stupid :\| --[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 14:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

			::I've tried to clarify [[Meta.xml]] --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Vincent: /* sync_map_element_data */

2012-06-16T14:09:29Z

sync_map_element_data

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 16 June 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The fraction of the size that it would have been if the element data was synced.		The fraction of the size that it would have been if the element data was synced.
	--[[User:Arran Fortuna\|Arran Fortuna]] 12:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)		--[[User:Arran Fortuna\|Arran Fortuna]] 12:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


			Still don't get it...<br>
			As I understand this, if the option is set to false, 'map download' goes separately from another download... which download? sorry if the question is stupid :\| --[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 14:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Arran Fortuna: /* sync_map_element_data */

2012-06-16T12:09:36Z

sync_map_element_data

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 16 June 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	could you rephrase it, please? :)		could you rephrase it, please? :)
	--[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 10:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)		--[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 10:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

			The fraction of the size that it would have been if the element data was synced.
			--[[User:Arran Fortuna\|Arran Fortuna]] 12:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Vincent: /* sync_map_element_data */

2012-06-16T10:23:33Z

sync_map_element_data

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 16 June 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	make 'map download' a fraction of which size?<br>		make 'map download' a fraction of which size?<br>
	could you rephrase it, please? :)		could you rephrase it, please? :)
			--[[User:Vincent\|Vincent]] 10:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Vincent: /* sync_map_element_data */ new section

2012-06-16T10:23:20Z

sync_map_element_data: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 16 June 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Hi, could you check these pages, please: [[Talk:Building_MTASA_Server_on_GNU_Linux]], [[Talk:Compiling_MTASA]]? Imma translate them both into Russian but need to find out smth :P		Hi, could you check these pages, please: [[Talk:Building_MTASA_Server_on_GNU_Linux]], [[Talk:Compiling_MTASA]]? Imma translate them both into Russian but need to find out smth :P
	::I've unlocked that page now so you can edit it. Thanks! --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)		::I've unlocked that page now so you can edit it. Thanks! --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

			== sync_map_element_data ==

			hi, that's me again :) now I'm finishing translating 'meta.xml' article and I have a problem with understanding that new feature.<br>
			I can't get what it does with the size, um...<br>
			"Adding this to the meta.xml of the gamemode and it will make the "map download" a fraction of the size."<br>
			make 'map download' a fraction of which size?<br>
			could you rephrase it, please? :)

Ccw at 03:55, 3 June 2012

2012-06-03T03:55:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 3 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~=Dual version vision=~~
	* Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

	::I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 either, but many people won't do it, at least not at first. We can't force people to upgrade and the risks of making users choose between 1.0.4 and 1.1 is that they hold on to 1.0.4 for longer. I suggest that by planning for a certain amount of coexistence between the previous and current version, we can actually get people to upgrade quicker. This is because by allowing 1.1 servers to appear in the 1.0.4 browser, we tempt 1.0.4 players to try 1.1 every time they play.
	~~::For server owners this means:~~
	~~::* No punishment for servers who decide to switch to 1.1 without an 1.0.4 alternative~~
	~~::* Having an instant player audience for 1.1 servers (which should increase 1.1 players counts quicker)~~
	~~::* Being higher up in the server browser (as the default sorting will be 1.1 servers above 1.0 servers)~~
	~~::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)~~
	~~:::I agree :) [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 12:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)~~
	=Some compiling manual stuff=		=Some compiling manual stuff=
	Hi, could you check these pages, please: [[Talk:Building_MTASA_Server_on_GNU_Linux]], [[Talk:Compiling_MTASA]]? Imma translate them both into Russian but need to find out smth :P		Hi, could you check these pages, please: [[Talk:Building_MTASA_Server_on_GNU_Linux]], [[Talk:Compiling_MTASA]]? Imma translate them both into Russian but need to find out smth :P
			::I've unlocked that page now so you can edit it. Thanks! --[[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 03:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Vincent at 16:04, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T16:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 31 May 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)		::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
	:::I agree :) [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 12:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)		:::I agree :) [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 12:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
			=Some compiling manual stuff=
			Hi, could you check these pages, please: [[Talk:Building_MTASA_Server_on_GNU_Linux]], [[Talk:Compiling_MTASA]]? Imma translate them both into Russian but need to find out smth :P

EAi: /* Dual version vision */

2010-12-04T12:20:42Z

Dual version vision

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 4 December 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::* Being higher up in the server browser (as the default sorting will be 1.1 servers above 1.0 servers)		::* Being higher up in the server browser (as the default sorting will be 1.1 servers above 1.0 servers)
	::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)		::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
			:::I agree :) [[User:EAi\|eAi]] 12:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Ccw at 19:57, 1 December 2010

2010-12-01T19:57:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 1 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Dual version vision=		=Dual version vision=
	* Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)		* Why do we need to support dual versions? I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 since it's more or less backwards compatible entirely, and us enforcing that change by whatever means possible. The new features will make it attractive for server admins to upgrade, and we could try and work on the overall switchover process. This could involve releasing the server early, giving a client release date, and making sure all server admins are ready for the switch. --[[User:Talidan\|Talidan]] 16:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

			::I don't see any drawbacks of everyone just switching to 1.1 either, but many people won't do it, at least not at first. We can't force people to upgrade and the risks of making users choose between 1.0.4 and 1.1 is that they hold on to 1.0.4 for longer. I suggest that by planning for a certain amount of coexistence between the previous and current version, we can actually get people to upgrade quicker. This is because by allowing 1.1 servers to appear in the 1.0.4 browser, we tempt 1.0.4 players to try 1.1 every time they play.
			::For server owners this means:
			::* No punishment for servers who decide to switch to 1.1 without an 1.0.4 alternative
			::* Having an instant player audience for 1.1 servers (which should increase 1.1 players counts quicker)
			::* Being higher up in the server browser (as the default sorting will be 1.1 servers above 1.0 servers)
			::Which all encourages server owners to switch. (The real key here). [[User:Ccw\|Ccw]] 19:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)