Talk:New coding guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→auto vs auto*: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
-- [[User:Tracer|Tracer]] ([[User talk:Tracer|talk]]) 18:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) | -- [[User:Tracer|Tracer]] ([[User talk:Tracer|talk]]) 18:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
::It doesn't really matter, but I personally find using auto* more readable. This one small asterisk doesn't change anything, it doesn't cost much, and it always makes the code more readable at first glance, without having to look at the entire line to know that it will be a pointer. -- [[User:FileEX|FileEX]] ([[User talk:FileEX|talk]]) 01:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:47, 25 June 2024
auto vs auto*
When you use static_cast, wouldn't it be better to use auto instead of auto*?
auto* obj = static_cast<Class*>(object); // vs auto obj = static_cast<Class*>(object);
It would have the same result. Yes, * marks the variable as a pointer but
from the cast we can see that it is a pointer nonetheless.
-- Tracer (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't really matter, but I personally find using auto* more readable. This one small asterisk doesn't change anything, it doesn't cost much, and it always makes the code more readable at first glance, without having to look at the entire line to know that it will be a pointer. -- FileEX (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)