Talk:CreateProjectile: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this fun...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--[[User:Stevvo|Stevvo]] 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. ['''Note to someone in QA''', can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] [[User:EAi|eAi]] 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
::Thanks, much appreciated :D--[[User:Stevvo|Stevvo]] 06:19, 19 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
:::What rocket type is this (for docs)? --[[User:Talidan|Talidan]] 22:34, 19 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
== Non confirmed issues == | |||
Whether issue should be confirmed on bugtrack before it will be added there? [[User:Lopez|Lopez]] 13:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:01, 1 April 2014
If it isn't too much hastle could you add support for rocket id 58 in the future? You can set it at an offset of +0 at 0xC891A8 just like 19 and 20 for the normal rockets, however this function returns false if an ID that it deems invalid is passed through it.--Stevvo 17:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- We could arrange that, I'm not sure why we haven't already got it. [Note to someone in QA, can you add an issue for this (just that we should have projectile id 58, we don't need the offset stuff)?] eAi 19:38, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
Non confirmed issues
Whether issue should be confirmed on bugtrack before it will be added there? Lopez 13:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)